Post Number:#34 Post
by ofonorow » Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:08 am
Thanks johnwen. I basically agree.
The first thing - when she did the protocol as Jaffee advised - with sodium ascorbate - no reaction. 48 grams in 2 hours.
So was the ultra-fine ascorbic acid that much better, or is Jaffe correct that we need sodium ascorbate (alkaline enviornment?)
His lectures point to the idea of "complexing, mobilizing and safely expelling" heavy metals with ascorbate in the order of affinity he calculated himself (but apparently never published).
He also pointed out that the reason for the high-dosage cleanse - because the inevitable water discharge expells the metals before they can reabsorb in the digestive tract . (While bowel tolerance was "too slow" for this purpose, according to Jaffe).
Back to this woman - quite a reaction with ultrafine ascorbic acid powder.
Now we want to protect her - and we are going to try and get a baseline mercury blood level from Quicksilver.
All future protocols will be with the ultra-fine - but with all the other elements jaffe claims are important. I recognize glutathione promoting nutrients, sulphur foods and nutrients, for complexing, and the others (zinc/magnesium) for what the high dose vitamin C might be removing, etc. She has DMSA and I will get her the IMD (large silica) product from Quicksilver.
If her "calibration" number goes down (as Jaffe predicts it will) then we will run another quicksilver blood test to verify/quantify. And we hope to minimize her "herx reactions in the the future.
Owen (Rick) Fonorow
HeartCURE.Info -
American Scientist's Invention Could Prevent 350,000 Heart Bypass Operations a yearHeartCure.INFO VitaminCFoundation.com CARDIO-C.COM
Grow Younger With LifeWave https://lifewave.com/vitamincfoundation